Archive for October, 2009

TOK Prescribed Titles For Essays — November 2010 & May 2011

Saturday, October 24th, 2009

The following is a copy of the official IB prescribed titles sheet:

Theory of knowledge prescribed titles

November 2010 and May 2011

Instructions to candidates

Your theory of knowledge essay for examination must be submitted to your teacher for authentication. It must be written on one of the ten titles (questions) provided below. You may choose any title, but are recommended to consult with your teacher. Your essay will be marked according to the assessment criteria published in the Theory of Knowledge guide. Remember to centre your essay on knowledge issues and, where appropriate, refer to other parts of your IB programme and to your experiences as a knower. Always justify your statements and provide relevant examples to illustrate your arguments. Pay attention to the implications of your arguments, and remember to consider what can be said against them. If you use external sources, cite them according to a recognized convention.

Note that statements in quotations in these titles are not necessarily authentic: they present a real point of view but may not have been spoken or written by an actual person. It is appropriate to analyse them but it is unnecessary, even unwise, to spend time on researching a context for them.

Examiners mark essays against the title as set. Respond to the title exactly as given; do not alter it in any way.
Your essay must be between 1200 and 1600 words in length.

1. Consider the extent to which knowledge issues in ethics are similar to those in at least one other area of knowledge.

2. How important are the opinions of experts in the search for knowledge?

3. “Doubt is the key to knowledge” (Persian Proverb). To what extent is this true in two areas of knowledge?

4. To what extent do we need evidence to support our beliefs in different areas of knowledge?

5. To what extent are the various areas of knowledge defined by their methodologies rather than their content?

6. “There are no absolute distinctions between what is true and what is false”. Discuss this claim.

7. How can we recognise when we have made progress in the search for knowledge? Consider two contrasting areas of knowledge.

8. “Art is a lie that brings us nearer to the truth” (Pablo Picasso). Evaluate this claim in relation to a specific art form (for example, visual arts, literature, theatre).

9. Discuss the roles of language and reason in history.

10. A model is a simplified representation of some aspect of the world. In what ways may models help or hinder the search for knowledge?




Choose A Piece Of Art

Monday, October 12th, 2009

Go to Art Galleries. Choose a painting and then, using the hand-out outline, write a short comment (include the link to the artwork you chose).

You should comment on:

Description

Analysis

Interpretation

Judgment

You can also choose a work of art from these sources:

The Greatest Works of Art

Another site titled The Greatest Works of Art

Best Works of Art in the World

Famous Paintings

The World’s 50 Best Works of Art (and how to see them)

50 Most Famous Works posters (this is from a site that sells posters, but does provides nice images of famous pieces of art)




Is This Art?

Monday, October 12th, 2009

Read this short article about a $12 million stuffed shark.

Then watch this short video about it.

Next, watch this short video about an exhibition consisting of an empty room.

Are either, or both,of these examples “art”? If so, why? If not, why not?

(This blog post is adapted from a lesson in the Lancaster School Theory of Knowledge blog)